<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luppitt Renewable Energy Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/</link>
	<description>East Devon Green Eco Type Person!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:00:24 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luppitt Looking Forward to a Sustainable Future &#124; Sharon Pavey</title>
		<link>http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Luppitt Looking Forward to a Sustainable Future &#124; Sharon Pavey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>[...] the floor was open for questions to the panel. I&#8217;ve blogged about this issue previously in Luppitt Renewable Energy Meeting explaining that this has all come about because of local Farmer Gavin Brake wanting to apply to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the floor was open for questions to the panel. I&#8217;ve blogged about this issue previously in Luppitt Renewable Energy Meeting explaining that this has all come about because of local Farmer Gavin Brake wanting to apply to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Crew</title>
		<link>http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>John Crew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 16:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Hello Sharon, only just picked up your message. Sorry I won&#039;t be able to be there. I do wholeheartly support the turbine proposal. Hope this evening&#039;s meeting goes well. Regards John Crew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Sharon, only just picked up your message. Sorry I won&#8217;t be able to be there. I do wholeheartly support the turbine proposal. Hope this evening&#8217;s meeting goes well. Regards John Crew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bee Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Bee Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 21:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sharonpavey.org/luppitt-renewable-energy-meeting/#comment-189</guid>
		<description>I favour virtually all wind turbine proposals. My own electricity has been supplied by &#039;Good Energy&#039; since visiting the wind farm at Delabole several years ago. The turbines have a grace and beauty of their own and are certainly more attractive than any nuclear power station. If people want electricity they must accept some visual impact on the landscape -and it will always have to be in somebody&#039;s back yard! We are already accustomed to pylons across the countryside. If we continue using CO2 producing technologies this &#039;green and pleasant&#039; land is likely to end up as uninhabitable desert and/or seascape anyway!
       We need to dispel the myth that nuclear power is a low CO2 source of energy. When you consider the vast amount of [high CO2 creating] concrete required to build, then decommission a nuclear reactor, the transportation and disposal of toxic waste, not to mention the lethal legacy our children will have to deal with, the nuclear road is a very irresponsible and short sighted one to take. Given the current knowledge and technologies available, the wind, water and solar route is the only way to go.
        Bee x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I favour virtually all wind turbine proposals. My own electricity has been supplied by &#8216;Good Energy&#8217; since visiting the wind farm at Delabole several years ago. The turbines have a grace and beauty of their own and are certainly more attractive than any nuclear power station. If people want electricity they must accept some visual impact on the landscape -and it will always have to be in somebody&#8217;s back yard! We are already accustomed to pylons across the countryside. If we continue using CO2 producing technologies this &#8216;green and pleasant&#8217; land is likely to end up as uninhabitable desert and/or seascape anyway!<br />
       We need to dispel the myth that nuclear power is a low CO2 source of energy. When you consider the vast amount of [high CO2 creating] concrete required to build, then decommission a nuclear reactor, the transportation and disposal of toxic waste, not to mention the lethal legacy our children will have to deal with, the nuclear road is a very irresponsible and short sighted one to take. Given the current knowledge and technologies available, the wind, water and solar route is the only way to go.<br />
        Bee x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

